翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Escola Portuguesa de Arte Equestre
・ Escola Portuguesa de Luanda
・ Escola Portuguesa de Moçambique
・ Escola Portuguesa Ruy Cinatti
・ Escola Secundária Artística António Arroio
・ Escola Secundária Eça de Queirós (Póvoa de Varzim)
・ Escola Secundária Sá de Miranda
・ Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra
・ Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
・ Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais (Setúbal)
・ Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra
・ Escola Superior de Estudos Industriais e de Gestão
・ Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing
・ Escola Superior Náutica Infante Dom Henrique
・ Escola técnica
Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
・ Escola Valls Futbol
・ Escolania de Montserrat
・ Escolar
・ Escolastico Calvo
・ Escolca
・ EscoLIVE
・ Escolives-Sainte-Camille
・ Escolta Street
・ ESCOM
・ Escom
・ Escom (computer corp)
・ ESCOM United F.C.
・ Escoma
・ Escoma Municipality


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. : ウィキペディア英語版
Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

''Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.'', 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944), was a decision of the Supreme Court of California involving an injury caused by an exploding bottle of Coca-Cola. It was an important case in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States, not so much for the actual majority opinion, but for the concurring opinion of California Supreme Court justice Roger Traynor.
==Facts and procedural history==
Plaintiff Gladys Escola was a waitress in a restaurant. She was putting away glass bottles of Coca-Cola when one of the bottles spontaneously exploded in her hand. She suffered a deep five-inch cut, which severed the blood vessels, nerves, and muscles of the thumb and palm of the hand.
The top portion of the bottle, with the cap, remained in her hand, and the lower portion fell to the floor but did not break. The broken bottle was not produced at the trial, because the pieces had been thrown away by an employee of the restaurant shortly after the accident. Escola, however, described the broken pieces, and a diagram of the bottle was made showing the location of the "fracture line" where the bottle broke in two. One of Coca-Cola's delivery drivers was called as a witness by plaintiff, and testified that he had seen other bottles of Coca-Cola in the past explode and had found broken bottles in the warehouse when he took the cases out, but that he did not know what made them blow up.
Escola was represented at trial by legendary litigator Melvin Belli, then in the early stage of his career. He later acknowledged in his own autobiography that he did not fully comprehend at the time that Escola's case would become a far-reaching landmark case.〔Melvin M. Belli and Robert Blair Kaiser, ''Melvin Belli: My Life on Trial, an Autobiography'' (New York: William Morrow and Company, 1976), 208.〕 The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, following the doctrine of ''res ipsa loquitur''.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.